Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m7-6Y75 1,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 32 2-Core 49.9 24% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 79.7 8-Core 104 12% 91.8 Pts	64-Core 93.6 6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake) 10,056 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 071B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4799 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 2.69 5% 4.38 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme PC401 SK hy 256GB 1,712 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 314 317 318 319 319 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 542 Mixed 733 SusWrite 315 118% 521 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 34.8 129% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 296 213% 278 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
0 2x4GB 1,733 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 16.4 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 234 17% 234 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 10,056 samples	174x

SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	15x
SSDSCKKF256H6 SATA 256GBIntelBench 64%, 3,152 samples	9x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	7x

RAM
2x4GB0Bench 58%, 1,733 samples	107x
2x8GB0Bench 63%, 1,950 samples	36x
H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GBHynixBench 58%, 6,118 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16