Asus P7P55D EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D EVO (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100524
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 14:57
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Very good	Memory 96 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 192 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 376 50% 373 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% PwrHis(1787 200F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 53.4 Parallax 56.5 35% 50.9 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 45.1 Splatting 41.9 38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 13,609 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 377 388 410 421 433 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 370 Write 330 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 388 211% 292 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 2.1 426% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 213%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 0GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.7 Write 10.3 Mixed 7 13% 12 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.8 101% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 13%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB 0GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 18.2 Write 4 Mixed 7 10% 9.73 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.6 138% 2.33 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 14.3 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 53.8 74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D EVO Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	40x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	28x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	46x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16