| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | HP 700-202eg (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131205 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 17 '19 at 14:21 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
71% 128 Pts
|
64% 505 Pts
|
36% 583 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
25.1%
Poor
|
25% 31 fps
|
25% 29.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 183 191 191 193 192 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
122% 167 MB/s
|
170% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
|
139% 114 MB/s
|
224% 3.27 MB/s
| ||
|
SAMSUNG HN-M750MBB 750GB
81GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 83 83 83 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
82% 61 MB/s
|
70% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
494GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 89 93 93 MB/s
|
40.4%
Average
|
118% 86.9 MB/s
|
112% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
54.3%
Above average
|
54% 18.7 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 700-202eg Builds (Compare 1 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 700-202eg
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $192 |