Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 09:36
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 127
57% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 319
35% 278 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 101
55% 80.9 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 61.6
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 117 123 121 122 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 321
Write 152
Mixed 190
SusWrite 124
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 21.5
74% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 118
98% 140 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
941GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 142 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 144
Write 117
Mixed 68
SusWrite 141
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
426GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 114 117 115 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 116
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback