Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
27 days ago, 26 days ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 05:39
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-9900K-$455
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
78.9% Very good
1-Core 133
2-Core 243
90% 188 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 712
69% 552 Pts
64-Core 1,137
76% 1,137 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$1,100
EVGA(3842 2484) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 384
Parallax 371
71% 337 fps
MRender 437
Gravity 521
Splatting 286
135% 415 fps
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 183%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 156 112 104 99 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 408
Write 402
Mixed 324
SusWrite 158
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 38.6
133% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 135%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$204
561GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1138 255 156 234 164 163 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,156
Write 1,220
Mixed 873
SusWrite 352
202% 900 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 53.6
178% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 320
404% 719 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 164%
Great: 290%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$204
930GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 1491 1499 594 160 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,202
Write 1,228
Mixed 868
SusWrite 901
236% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 52.8
178% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 323
406% 721 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 199%
Great: 290%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
732GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 123 155 159 148 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 102
Write 116
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 142
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.7
223% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 13.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 95%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 6,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 140%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $241

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback