Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170609
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 03:41
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 113 44% 74.7 Pts	4-Core 82.3 8-Core 112 12% 97 Pts	64-Core 279 17% 279 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11BF) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.7% Poor	Lighting 23.4 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 36.8 19% 29.6 fps	MRender 34.9 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 35.7 30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB 3,478 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 243 79 57 60 60 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36% Below average	Read 108 Write 97 Mixed 106 SusWrite 102 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 12.2 48% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 289 DQ Mixed 154 142% 213 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 93%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 34GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 134 53 56 55 54 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.7% Poor	Read 244 Write 158 Mixed 171 SusWrite 78.5 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 3.8 33% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 92.3 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 78.2 68% 100 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 85%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 15GB free Firmware: GT001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 68 67 69 68 69 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 48.3 Write 56.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 65.5 34% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GB 8,909 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.7% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 2.1 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	303x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	169x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	145x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	45x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16