| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130410 |
| Uptime | 11.2 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 17 '19 at 01:28 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
36%
Below average
|
25% 44 Pts
|
22% 159 Pts
|
10% 162 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1571) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
20% 29.5 fps
|
13% 18.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 36 24 24 32 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
28% 37.5 MB/s
|
122% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
25.2%
Poor
|
28% 9.77 GB/s
|
10% 3.5 GB/s
|
21% 194 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |