Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '19 at 00:30
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 79.4 1-Core 145 2-Core 284 92% 169 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 834 81% 666 Pts	64-Core 1,053 65% 1,053 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 69.6 Parallax 90.2 58% 77 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 74.9 Splatting 58.3 55% 67.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 140 109 107 89 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 437 Write 118 Mixed 262 SusWrite 162 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 40.2 155% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 188 160% 231 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 25GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 515 Write 494 Mixed 465 110% 491 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 64.7 219% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 370 279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 392GB free Firmware: MS2OA8R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 133 135 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 139 Write 139 Mixed 49 SusWrite 132 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 107%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 288GB free, PID fc76 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 112 Write 115 Mixed 29 SusWrite 96.8 115% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.9% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 30.1 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 29.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 87%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	484x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD $210Bench 84%, 294,959 samples	160x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	89x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x

SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	46x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)