Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190925
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 18:49
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7940X-$815 4,560 User benchmarks, average bench 83% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 222 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 736 70% 582 Pts	64-Core 1,808 112% 1,808 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.8% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 114 Parallax 93.6 83% 103 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 93.5 Splatting 101 79% 96.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 269GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1738 800 614 616 610 604 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 2,108 Write 2,072 Mixed 1,383 SusWrite 830 358% 1,599 MB/s	4K Read 54.8 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 73.9 272% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,196 DQ Write 1,012 DQ Mixed 1,090 821% 1,099 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 340%
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB 26,659 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 844GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 429 427 430 413 400 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 434 Mixed 407 SusWrite 421 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 49 160% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 293 237% 336 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 123%
Promise Pegasus2 R6 15TB 7.5TB free Firmware: 0504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 91 90 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 172 172 173 174 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 163 Mixed 31 SusWrite 171 98% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 140 140 140 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 94.5 Write 82 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 139 63% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 166 173 173 174 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 86.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 168 82% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 107%
Seagate ST10000NM0086-2AA101 10TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 7.5TB free Firmware: SN05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 235 233 232 230 234 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 226 Write 216 Mixed 107 SusWrite 232 143% 195 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.1 336% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 138%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 12TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 6.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 329 336 332 333 326 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 250 Write 155 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 331 260% 198 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 127%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 10,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 50.1 MC Mixed 32.8 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 9.9 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	495x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16