Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Memory 11.8 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 45.5 14% 26.7 Pts	4-Core 81.2 8-Core 104 12% 92.6 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M 4,542 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	2.59% Terrible	Lighting 2.93 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.91 fps	MRender 5.43 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.43 3% 3.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.59% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 144 109 141 142 141 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.8% Poor	Read 169 Write 151 Mixed 162 SusWrite 138 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 6.2 21% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 4x4GB 359 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 387 10% 387 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	11x

GPU
Quadro FX 880MNvidiaBench 2%, 4,542 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	2x
Vertex 3 120GBOCZ $42Bench 69%, 25,948 samples	2x
Pyro 240GBPatriot $172Bench 66%, 345 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 247 samples	1x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $304

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16