Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 10:19
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 210
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 557
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 18
Parallax 21.4
20% 21.2 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 17.9
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 89 99 121 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 462
Write 187
Mixed 212
SusWrite 109
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 40.4
172% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 41.2
90% 192 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
169GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 126 127 122 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 68.8
Write 86.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 123
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
8GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4 4 4 4 4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 35.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4
11% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback