Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Memory 22.1 1-Core 27.3 2-Core 43.8 18% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 75.9 8-Core 94 11% 84.9 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.65 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.24 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 165GB free Firmware: V3.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 269 276 264 280 284 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 328 Write 303 Mixed 252 SusWrite 271 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 19.7 4K Mixed 6.6 36% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 14.7 41% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 151%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 88GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.63% Terrible	Read 20.3 Write 19.7 Mixed 8.2 SusWrite 24.6 24% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.63% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 305 13% 305 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16