Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190822
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 10:07
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 37.1 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 121 41% 74.5 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 397 38% 312 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 18.41.50 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.63% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 4.41 3% 13.8 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 3.48 3% 3.24 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.63% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HS-SSD-E2000 512GB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1122 334 448 468 440 482 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	144% Outstanding	Read 1,108 Write 1,360 Mixed 1,033 SusWrite 549 228% 1,013 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 48.1 150% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 524 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 491 351% 454 MB/s
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 144% Great: 247%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 138 138 139 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 133 Write 134 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 136 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.6 236% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.56% Terrible	Read 30.7 Write 4.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.2 11% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 45% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.56% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 13.1 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.1 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,836x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	979x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,360x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	508x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	406x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16