Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	373% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 06:11
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 70 1-Core 151 2-Core 297 91% 173 Pts	4-Core 591 8-Core 1,010 97% 801 Pts	64-Core 1,438 89% 1,438 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 3FEB) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.2% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 45.8 Parallax 37.2 32% 40.9 fps	MRender 56.8 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 51.8 41% 49.4 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB 22,361 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: SS0411BB SusWrite @10s intervals: 2071 2001 2082 2160 2192 2185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	373% Outstanding	Read 2,432 Write 2,233 Mixed 230 SusWrite 2,115 392% 1,753 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 87.8 296% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,320 DQ Write 1,150 DQ Mixed 585 616% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 373% Great: 370%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 365GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 424 393 206 202 179 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 439 Mixed 417 SusWrite 305 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 50.9 167% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 664GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 119 120 120 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 104 Write 100 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 119 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 536GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 66 65 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 94.5 Write 92 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 65.3 63% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 83%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 905GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 106 Write 103 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 77.5 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 100%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 64GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 90 87 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 94.7 Write 87.3 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 89.1 61% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 88%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$242 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 175GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 152 153 154 151 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 124 Write 129 Mixed 89 SusWrite 153 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 494% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GTZSK F4-3200C16-16GTZKW F4-3200C16-16GTZSK F4-3200C16-16GTZKW 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 25.9 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 27.3 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 161%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 162%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $254

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	438x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	336x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	288x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	215x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	212x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	155x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	131x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	129x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	88x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	103x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	48x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,467

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16