Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 05:44
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 211
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 470
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 93% Great: 112%
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 61.2
56% 66.9 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 71.4
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 180 186 181 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 334
Write 299
Mixed 260
SusWrite 183
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 32.1
109% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 186
149% 210 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
255GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 186 184 188 183 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 340
Write 326
Mixed 297
SusWrite 186
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 39.4
121% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 227
170% 228 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
209GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 106 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 76.2
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 106
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 114%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 104 70 54 65 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 150
Write 131
Mixed 80
SusWrite 86.1
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.4 9 11 9.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 104
Write 7.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 10.3
31% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.3
92% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 45.2
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 102%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback