Asus STRIX B250G GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180328
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 02:11
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700-$306
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
67.2% Good
1-Core 103
2-Core 186
69% 145 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 585
61% 476 Pts
64-Core 579
39% 579 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$22
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 147 141 143 226 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 311
Write 106
Mixed 206
SusWrite 172
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 25.2
101% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 56.6
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 52.7
41% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 79%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
776GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 168 170 173 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 162
Mixed 111
SusWrite 171
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX B250G GAMING Builds (Compare 3,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250G GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $534
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback