Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 81 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 140 59% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 404 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5210 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 303% 446GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 312 296 293 304 306 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	273% Outstanding	Read 3,210 Write 333 Mixed 2,418 SusWrite 304 343% 1,566 MB/s	4K Read 98.6 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 104 336% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 465 DQ Write 479 DQ Mixed 464 351% 469 MB/s
Poor: 273% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 326%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1TB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 88 86 72 84 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 75.2 Write 39 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 80.2 65% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0 16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 32GB 2133, 2666, 2133, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 13.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 15.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16