HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130131
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	26%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594 5,754 User benchmarks, average bench 54% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 64.5 2-Core 111 53% 84.3 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 166 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000 1,496 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 176C) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Lighting 5.37 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 7.09 4% 6.18 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 6.09 4% 5.19 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 237GB 3,335 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 221GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 271 261 270 271 275 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 350 Write 265 Mixed 264 SusWrite 271 65% 288 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 28 102% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 212 163% 220 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 100%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75 5,635 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 279GB free (System drive) Firmware: MH000C SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 53 51 48 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Read 45.8 Write 8.3 Mixed 19 SusWrite 50.4 23% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 13.3 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16