| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170526 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 15 '19 at 19:58 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
71.1%
Very good
|
70% 119 Pts
|
47% 380 Pts
|
28% 450 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.94
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
19% 21.5 fps
|
18% 22.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 299 301 311 270 302 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
76% 340 MB/s
|
94% 33 MB/s
|
127% 253 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
778GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 156 155 158 158 MB/s
|
91.9%
Outstanding
|
96% 133 MB/s
|
156% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
56% 71.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,974 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 339x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 267x |
| Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 143x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 126x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 113x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 107x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $158 |