Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 19:03
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 407
58% 424 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2716) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 4.41
4% 4.44 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.82 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,825
Write 3822
Mixed 3,737
849% 3,795 MB/s
4K Read 124
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 92.7
359% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 410
302% 398 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
347GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 113 50 243 279 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 416
Write 300
Mixed 224
SusWrite 190
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 12
53% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 90.1
DQ Mixed 11.1
34% 73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
447GB free
Firmware: 1AA01109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 72 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 89
Write 99.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 72.2
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
209% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 60%
Megaraid LD 0 MEGARAID 502GB
454GB free
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 21 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 17.5
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 19.9
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 28%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
568GB free, PID a001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 160 167 154 160 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 229
Write 228
Mixed 169
SusWrite 162
263% 197 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 11.9
909% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.2
1,073% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 113%
Great: 223%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
3TB free, PID 25ee
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 148 145 149 148 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 136
Write 146
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 146
170% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 103%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
491GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 26 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 26.7
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback