Asrock P67 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Performance  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 12:34
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.5% Good
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 186
67% 141 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 355
49% 355 Pts
64-Core 354
24% 354 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gainward(10B0 0801) 2GB
CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 57
16% 58.8 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 60.9
Splatting 49.1
18% 55.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$76
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 264 264 261 261 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 398
Write 389
Mixed 323
SusWrite 275
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 34.6
118% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 46.1
42% 63 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
926GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 57 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 200
Write 144
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 55.7
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 114%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
181GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 57 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 15
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 55.7
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P67 Performance Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback