| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H67M (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120427 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 15 '19 at 06:13 |
| Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 59% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.4%
Very good
|
61% 105 Pts
|
47% 372 Pts
|
29% 464 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291
|
1.24%
Terrible
|
1% 1.45 fps
|
2% 1.88 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 96 84 85 109 108 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
72% 96.9 MB/s
|
165% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
BUFFALO External HDD 4TB
3TB free, PID 01f1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
76% 65.5 MB/s
|
102% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
50.3%
Above average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 26x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 19x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 19x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $350 |