Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF (all builds)
Memory	44.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190508
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '19 at 02:32
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790 3,658 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 57 1-Core 104 2-Core 210 66% 124 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 803 72% 610 Pts	64-Core 4,394 272% 4,394 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3753) CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 19.1 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 24 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 17.3 17% 21 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 303 303 301 300 306 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 315 Mixed 312 SusWrite 304 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 35.1 134% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 247 211% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 274GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1680 877 890 881 880 883 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	275% Outstanding	Read 2,439 Write 1,883 Mixed 1836 SusWrite 1,015 401% 1,793 MB/s	4K Read 64 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 85.4 283% 98.1 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 593 DQ Mixed 601 454% 609 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 275% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 138GB free Firmware: SD17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 99 99 99 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 72 Write 72.7 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 98.7 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 169 173 173 177 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 14GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 102 104 103 103 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 101 Write 100 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 103 66% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 924GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 113 115 112 113 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 51.5 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 112 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 4x16GB 861 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.6% Above average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 21.6 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 18.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 141%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	84x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	44x
Ryzen TR 2920XAMDBench 81%, 3,902 samples	38x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	16x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 128%, 25 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 94%, 8,912 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,053

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16