Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 82.9 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 138 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 198 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sony(104D 907B) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.39 fps	MRender 3.33 Gravity 1.27 Splatting 4.09 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 128GB 1,050 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 35 20 39 30 29 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.7% Poor	Read 102 Write 261 Mixed 69 SusWrite 38.1 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 11.7 37% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 35.8 DQ Mixed 22.3 38% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 103%
ADATA HD710M 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 346GB free, PID a54a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 25 25 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 23 Mixed 23 SusWrite 25 33% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16