Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core Duo T2400 187 User benchmarks, average bench 32% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 17.2 2-Core 23.7 26% 33 Pts	4-Core 24.5 8-Core 22.5 3% 23.5 Pts	64-Core 19.5 1% 19.5 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 160GB (2010)-$50 2,106 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 36 27 32 32 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 6.7 Write 34.2 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 28.9 19% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 57% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 51%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 12GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.5 5.7 6.3 5.6 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	5.2% Terrible	Read 12 Write 6.7 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6 10% 7.88 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.1 63% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.2% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.23% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 0.97 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.23% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16