Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory114.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 18:34
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6800K-$250
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
78% 165 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 690
73% 571 Pts
64-Core 843
57% 843 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$528
EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 405
Parallax 464
118% 442 fps
MRender 249
Gravity 440
Splatting 264
106% 318 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$330
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 357 305 236 232 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 493
Write 357
Mixed 377
SusWrite 286
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 25.1
104% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 182
160% 245 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 135%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$35
304GB free
Firmware: A580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 114 103 98 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 77.2
Write 74.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 104
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$70
818GB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 155 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 146
Write 129
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 153
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86%
Great: 109%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$105
1TB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 133 131 135 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 74
SusWrite 134
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 109%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB
832GB free, PID 0257
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 97 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 94.5
Write 96.7
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 99.5
119% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 72%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
152GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 31 31 32 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 27
Mixed 26
SusWrite 31
39% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 49.8
MC Write 67.2
MC Mixed 55.9
165% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 22.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 144%
Great: 142%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 3,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $1,845
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $206Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback