Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 12:11
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 149
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 425
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1834 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 62.8
56% 67.2 fps
MRender 73.8
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 55.6
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 151
Write 98.5
Mixed 83.8
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 22.6
77% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 24.9
29% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
58GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 62 62 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 73
Write 56.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 62.9
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
21GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 62 62 62 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 96.5
Write 96.8
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 62.9
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
417GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 103 100 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 83.9
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 102
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
430GB free
Firmware: AM0P2C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 114 111 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 113
65% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLTU160N01 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback