Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150805
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '19 at 11:53
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 436 43% 351 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1645 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 77.2 Parallax 74.2 60% 74.8 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 59.9 54% 67.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 246 Write 116 Mixed 159 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 24.1 80% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 35.7 34% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 58GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 63 64 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 54 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 62.7 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 21GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 64 64 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 95.5 Write 97.7 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 62.7 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 417GB free Firmware: GR2OA3E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 103 102 103 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 98.9 Write 69 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 102 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 58%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 430GB free Firmware: AM0P2C SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 114 114 113 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 112 64% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SP008GBLTU160N01 Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 10.8 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16