PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus EX-H310M-V3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190530 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 14 '19 at 06:54 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | PHL-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
88.7%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 7500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3680 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 68 31 28 68 47 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
12GB free
Firmware: 02.03B04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 63 63 63 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
49GB free
Firmware: 02.03B04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 72 71 71 73 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
86.3%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 48x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 36x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 17x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $161 |