Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 02:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 196
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 784
70% 589 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 76
Parallax 65.9
60% 72 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 71.5
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 436 484 489 473 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 489
Mixed 460
SusWrite 419
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 55.6
185% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 120%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
838GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 74 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 215
Write 83.8
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 78.2
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
59GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 12 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 12.9
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3.6
196% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 29.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback