| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110621 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '19 at 01:39 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | PAN-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.3%
Above average
|
58% 89 Pts
|
21% 159 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0102) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.99%
Terrible
|
1% 1.01 fps
|
1% 1.39 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 37 68 103 94 108 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
62% 84.6 MB/s
|
144% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.6%
Poor
|
25% 8.8 GB/s
|
26% 9.17 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 376 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 62x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 41x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 54x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $77 |