Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 00:48
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 425
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Sapphire(174B 3376) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 30
Parallax 26
25% 29 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 29.7
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 132 148 148 141 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 390
Write 216
Mixed 253
SusWrite 135
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 38.3
137% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 189
140% 183 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 86%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$106
82GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 144 155 153 153 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 414
Write 228
Mixed 263
SusWrite 145
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 33.1
121% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 143
132% 205 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
614GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 151 159 161 160 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 167
Mixed 103
SusWrite 152
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
533GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 154 162 162 162 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 156
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 153
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.5
429% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
94GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.92% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 21.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 10.6
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.92%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback