HP HPE-410f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP HPE-410f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 21:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 83.1
46% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 224
24% 189 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 16.8
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 16.7
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 112 104 49 135 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 222
Write 186
Mixed 178
SusWrite 108
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 8.4
40% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 22.4
35% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 58%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
366GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 91.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 35.4
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 23.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 16.5
26% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.5
174% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GBH2X02E99927-160 4GBH2X02E99927-160 4GBH2X02E99927-160 4GBH2X02E99927-160 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-410f Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-410f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $165
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback