Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181219
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '19 at 20:37
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 755 71% 590 Pts	64-Core 919 57% 919 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 1884 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 43.8 Reflection 32 Parallax 35.5 36% 37.1 fps	MRender 42 Gravity 42.6 Splatting 38.4 33% 41 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,580 Write 2,236 Mixed 1,578 473% 2,131 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 83 286% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 940 DQ Mixed 967 726% 968 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 185 185 184 183 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 153 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 184 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.5 5.8 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	4.16% Terrible	Read 10.8 Write 4 Mixed 2 SusWrite 5.6 6% 5.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.16% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown? CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 1x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 15.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 15.7 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	67x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	64x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16