Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 19:34
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6800K-$250
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72.7% Very good
1-Core 116
2-Core 205
77% 161 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 587
62% 486 Pts
64-Core 794
53% 794 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
89% Excellent
Lighting 331
Reflection 168
Parallax 203
87% 234 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 334
Splatting 214
90% 252 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$107
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 224 92 85 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 380
Write 379
Mixed 321
SusWrite 150
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 40.6
141% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 135%
Kingston A400 240GB-$32
77GB free
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 195 225 246 219 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 207
Write 94.2
Mixed 170
SusWrite 227
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 20.6
83% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 208
165% 229 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58%
Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$127
931GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 354 411 424 447 446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 396
Mixed 364
SusWrite 402
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 49.2
156% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 135%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
665GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 171 176 176 178 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 160
Mixed 82
SusWrite 176
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 52.8
MC Mixed 39.2
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 21.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 3,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback