Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	299% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	122.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190214
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '19 at 19:02
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Memory 85.9 1-Core 125 2-Core 282 89% 164 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 877 84% 694 Pts	64-Core 1,419 88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% AMD(1002 0B36) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 181 95% 131 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 103 Splatting 127 91% 108 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 805GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1683 1573 1358 1166 1168 1179 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	299% Outstanding	Read 2,008 Write 1,651 Mixed 1,317 SusWrite 1,355 355% 1,583 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 192 4K Mixed 67.2 264% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,347 DQ Write 1165 DQ Mixed 1,243 935% 1,252 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 299% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250 3,023 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 3.5TB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 404 412 436 430 439 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 444 Mixed 371 SusWrite 421 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 41.4 156% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 355 268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW128GX4M8C3200C16 8x16GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	121% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 70.7 MC Mixed 39.1 139% 48.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 24.6 SC Mixed 12.8 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 183%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16