Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 18:54
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i3-7100-$122
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.9% Above average
1-Core 112
2-Core 185
72% 149 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 275
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 293
20% 293 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 21.4
5% 21.8 fps
MRender 19.7
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 33.3
6% 23.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 7%
AMD RX 570-$120
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.7% Average
Lighting 188
Reflection 156
Parallax 272
49% 206 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 180
Splatting 120
50% 145 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 52%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 207 214 222 216 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 395
Write 275
Mixed 182
SusWrite 217
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 29.3
121% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 121
125% 208 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
176GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 107 108 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 120
Write 102
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 107
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
149GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 107 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
60% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 63
SusWrite 108
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60%
Great: 72%
Seagate ST1000NM0011 1TB
335GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 105 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 110
Write 119
Mixed 65
SusWrite 104
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 84%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.1
5% 4.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
66.9% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 6,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $369
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback