Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 18:46
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 672
75% 589 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3186
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 25
Parallax 29.2
23% 27.4 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 22.7
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1087 1133 1162 1173 1178 1173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 1,179
Mixed 946
SusWrite 1151
258% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 78.9
274% 99 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 272
343% 602 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 242%
Great: 295%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 131 129 130 129 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 90.5
Write 119
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 128
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback