Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 18:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A4-4020 APU
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.6% Poor
1-Core 63
2-Core 103
40% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 104
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 103
7% 103 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 7.1
2% 8.6 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 10.6
2% 8.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$47
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 104 91 70 92 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 88.2
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 4,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 14% - Very poor Total price: $22
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $335Nvidia RTX 2060 $325Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $609SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback