Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 71.9 52% 75.7 Pts	4-Core 71.7 8-Core 70.3 10% 71 Pts	64-Core 67.5 4% 67.5 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 860GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 16 38 0.9 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 47.9 Write 47.7 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 15 21% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 79%
SDHC Card 16GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 14GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 14 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 8.2 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 15.5 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 48,985 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	33.3% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.6 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,160x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,680x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	636x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	359x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16