HP 860-170VR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 860-170VR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161206
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 16:42
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 677
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1064 1028 981 898 945 995 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$130
979GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 452 453 453 451 455 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 465
Mixed 327
SusWrite 453
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 36.4
156% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 260
217% 316 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 210 209 210 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 163
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 208
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 119%
Great: 114%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 42.7
Write 40.8
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 41.4
54% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 100%
SEAGATE ST68022CF 8GB
7GB free, PID 06c1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Read 8
Write 8.3
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 9.2
11% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 5%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 45
Write 44.3
Mixed 37
SusWrite 45.6
58% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 61%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1
Mixed 1
1% 1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%
USB FLASH DRIVE 2GB
1GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
21% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 8%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
59GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.88 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-170VR Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP 860-170VR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $274
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback