HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8770w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 176C
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130131
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 198 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 503 57% 444 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000M 355 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 736 MHz, MLim: 1175 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.51 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 21.9 Parallax 28.8 19% 24.8 fps	MRender 32.7 Gravity 28.2 Splatting 22.6 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: X410 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 438 Write 428 Mixed 312 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 25.2 80% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 28.4 101% 223 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 108%
Toshiba MQ03ABB300 3TB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 34GB free Firmware: JP05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 76 80 81 71 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 72.8 Write 76.5 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 87.7 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 71%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 60GB free Firmware: 2BE1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 70 70 84 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 87 Write 69 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 74.4 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GB 682 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.9 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 17.9 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	99x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	92x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	82x

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16