Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3615QM 2,657 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	64.2% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 154 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 349 37% 296 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Apple(106B 00F2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.24 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	7.2% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 7.92 Parallax 9.41 7% 8.64 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 10.3 8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.2% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 437GB free (System drive), PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 205 206 205 209 209 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 226 Write 209 Mixed 180 SusWrite 208 277% 206 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 15.5 1,383% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 17.9 DQ Write 33.4 DQ Mixed 19 1,849% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 204%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 16.3 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	169x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	87x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	83x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16