Apple MacBookPro14,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B4831CEBD52A0C4C
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 02:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 223
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 314
42% 311 Pts
64-Core 314
21% 314 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Apple(106B 0174) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4664
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 10.2
11% 11.7 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 15
7% 12.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 926 1004 823 739 722 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 23.7
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MacBookPro14,1 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro14,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $187Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback