Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
2 years ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 00:30
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X4 B55
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.5% Poor
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 91.1
32% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 165
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290
Asus(1043 8454) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 5
Parallax 1.6
1% 3 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 4.5
1% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$26
125GB free
Firmware: LV010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 19 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 17.8
Write 15.3
Mixed 13
SusWrite 17.4
12% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
59% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 31%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.6 6.2 6.3 6.6 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Read 10.3
Write 8.8
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 6.4
6% 8.58 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 76%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB
21GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 56.1
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 54.5
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 991681 (998681) 991681 (998681) 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 2,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $415
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $209Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback