HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 21:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 488
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 736 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.51
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 411 411 260 206 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 427
Mixed 397
SusWrite 304
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 33.6
108% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 38.6
120% 259 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ03ABB300 3TB
44GB free
Firmware: JP05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 73 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 75
Write 75
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 73.7
47% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
17GB free
Firmware: 2BE1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 72.2
Write 56.8
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 69.1
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
1GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.1
Write 29.6
Mixed 28.6
52% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.4
176% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback