Asrock H61M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120907
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '19 at 19:30
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 186 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 436 46% 365 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 20.8 Parallax 27.3 18% 23.3 fps	MRender 29 Gravity 26.4 Splatting 0.04 13% 18.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 21 17 25 29 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 16.5 Write 20.2 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 20.4 14% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 121 134 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 146 Write 138 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 130 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 2x8GB 754 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	100x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	78x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	116x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	54x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	26x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	18x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	13x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16