Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 15:56
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 85.5
40% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 127
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 21.3
15% 23.4 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 31.4
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 140 61 63 62 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 206
Write 167
Mixed 155
SusWrite 100
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 15
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 26.1
23% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
308GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 58 61 58 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 78
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 60.3
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 63%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.2 8.2 5.9 8.1 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Read 2
Write 2
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 7.2
7% 4.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.4
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback