Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 847
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 169
Parallax 181
142% 175 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 149
Splatting 106
117% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,789
Write 831
Mixed 385
218% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 44.3
188% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 744
DQ Mixed 696
580% 844 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
45GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 78.7
Write 75.3
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 70.5
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
28GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 126 126 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 123
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 126
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
17GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 154
Write 139
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 86.1
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback