| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock HM55-MXM (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20101024 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '19 at 10:24 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
46.4%
Average
|
53% 88.7 Pts
|
22% 165 Pts
|
10% 164 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280-$185
MSI(1462 277C) 3GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
30% 41.4 fps
|
29% 35.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 68 63 69 69 65 MB/s
|
59.7%
Above average
|
44% 196 MB/s
|
114% 38.1 MB/s
|
124% 181 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$60
444GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 103 103 103 MB/s
|
58.6%
Above average
|
69% 93.9 MB/s
|
185% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.3%
Poor
|
24% 8.23 GB/s
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical HM55-MXM Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock HM55-MXM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 11x |
| Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples | 4x |
| Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $195 |